You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Measuring Large-Scale Social Networks with High Resolution
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0095978 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arkadiusz Stopczynski, Vedran Sekara, Piotr Sapiezynski, Andrea Cuttone, Mette My Madsen, Jakob Eg Larsen, Sune Lehmann |
| Abstract |
This paper describes the deployment of a large-scale study designed to measure human interactions across a variety of communication channels, with high temporal resolution and spanning multiple years-the Copenhagen Networks Study. Specifically, we collect data on face-to-face interactions, telecommunication, social networks, location, and background information (personality, demographics, health, politics) for a densely connected population of 1000 individuals, using state-of-the-art smartphones as social sensors. Here we provide an overview of the related work and describe the motivation and research agenda driving the study. Additionally, the paper details the data-types measured, and the technical infrastructure in terms of both backend and phone software, as well as an outline of the deployment procedures. We document the participant privacy procedures and their underlying principles. The paper is concluded with early results from data analysis, illustrating the importance of multi-channel high-resolution approach to data collection. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 13% |
| United States | 6 | 10% |
| Denmark | 4 | 6% |
| France | 4 | 6% |
| Finland | 3 | 5% |
| Spain | 3 | 5% |
| Italy | 2 | 3% |
| Korea, Republic of | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 21 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 57% |
| Scientists | 27 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 340 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 2% |
| Denmark | 4 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 1% |
| Unknown | 315 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 91 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 61 | 18% |
| Researcher | 46 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 60 | 18% |
| Unknown | 43 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 89 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 34 | 10% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 34 | 10% |
| Engineering | 29 | 9% |
| Psychology | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 65 | 19% |
| Unknown | 70 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2023.
All research outputs
#512,045
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#7,044
of 223,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,415
of 242,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#179
of 4,916 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,916 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.