↓ Skip to main content

A Multi-Projector Calibration Method for Virtual Reality Simulators with Analytically Defined Screens

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Imaging, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Multi-Projector Calibration Method for Virtual Reality Simulators with Analytically Defined Screens
Published in
Journal of Imaging, June 2017
DOI 10.3390/jimaging3020019
Authors

Cristina Portalés, Sergio Casas, Inmaculada Coma, Marcos Fernández

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 22%
Researcher 1 11%
Lecturer 1 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 2 22%
Engineering 2 22%
Design 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2017.
All research outputs
#14,188,946
of 17,769,673 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Imaging
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,627
of 279,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Imaging
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,769,673 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them