↓ Skip to main content

Multi-Timescale Perceptual History Resolves Visual Ambiguity

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multi-Timescale Perceptual History Resolves Visual Ambiguity
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0001497
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan W. Brascamp, Tomas H. J. Knapen, Ryota Kanai, André J. Noest, Raymond van Ee, Albert V. van den Berg

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 4 3%
Germany 3 2%
Australia 2 2%
Canada 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 114 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 45 34%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 19%
Student > Master 13 10%
Professor 11 8%
Other 6 5%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 10 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 52 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 13%
Neuroscience 15 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 5%
Physics and Astronomy 6 5%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 22 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2017.
All research outputs
#7,530,253
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#89,948
of 195,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,145
of 157,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#151
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,816 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,258 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.