↓ Skip to main content

Maternal Neurofascin-Specific Autoantibodies Bind to Structures of the Fetal Nervous System during Pregnancy, but Have No Long Term Effect on Development in the Rat

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Maternal Neurofascin-Specific Autoantibodies Bind to Structures of the Fetal Nervous System during Pregnancy, but Have No Long Term Effect on Development in the Rat
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0085393
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sonja Hochmeister, Thomas Pekar, Maren Lindner, Maja Kitic, Michaela Haindl, Maria Storch, Franz Fazekas, Christopher Linington

Abstract

Neurofascin was recently reported as a target for axopathic autoantibodies in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), a response that will exacerbate axonal pathology and disease severity in an animal model of multiple sclerosis. As transplacental transfer of maternal autoantibodies can permanently damage the developing nervous system we investigated whether intrauterine exposure to this neurofascin-specific response had any detrimental effect on white matter tract development. To address this question we intravenously injected pregnant rats with either a pathogenic anti-neurofascin monoclonal antibody or an appropriate isotype control on days 15 and 18 of pregnancy, respectively, to mimic the physiological concentration of maternal antibodies in the circulation of the fetus towards the end of pregnancy. Pups were monitored daily with respect to litter size, birth weight, growth and motor development. Histological studies were performed on E20 embryos and pups sacrificed on days 2, 10, 21, 32 and 45 days post partum.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 10 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 35%
Neuroscience 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 11 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2014.
All research outputs
#20,217,843
of 22,741,406 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#173,231
of 194,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,414
of 305,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#4,814
of 5,562 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,741,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,562 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.