↓ Skip to main content

Contributions of wildland fire to terrestrial ecosystem carbon dynamics in North America from 1990 to 2012

Overview of attention for article published in Global Biogeochemical Cycles, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Contributions of wildland fire to terrestrial ecosystem carbon dynamics in North America from 1990 to 2012
Published in
Global Biogeochemical Cycles, May 2017
DOI 10.1002/2016gb005548
Authors

Guangsheng Chen, Daniel J. Hayes, A. David McGuire

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 25%
Researcher 6 15%
Other 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 10 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 12 30%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 15 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2018.
All research outputs
#6,768,671
of 26,052,823 outputs
Outputs from Global Biogeochemical Cycles
#948
of 1,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,266
of 331,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Biogeochemical Cycles
#8
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,052,823 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.