You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Opportunity or Orientation? Who Uses Urban Parks and Why
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0087422 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brenda B. Lin, Richard A. Fuller, Robert Bush, Kevin J. Gaston, Danielle F. Shanahan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 32% |
| United States | 5 | 20% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 76% |
| Scientists | 5 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 517 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 500 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 98 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 95 | 18% |
| Researcher | 68 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 5% |
| Other | 77 | 15% |
| Unknown | 110 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 123 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 69 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 52 | 10% |
| Psychology | 23 | 4% |
| Design | 19 | 4% |
| Other | 88 | 17% |
| Unknown | 143 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2016.
All research outputs
#1,486,802
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#18,429
of 224,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,507
of 327,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#546
of 5,662 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,455 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,662 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.