You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Gingival Fibroblasts as a Promising Source of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0012743 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hiroshi Egusa, Keisuke Okita, Hiroki Kayashima, Guannan Yu, Sho Fukuyasu, Makio Saeki, Takuya Matsumoto, Shinya Yamanaka, Hirofumi Yatani |
| Abstract |
Induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells efficiently generated from accessible tissues have the potential for clinical applications. Oral gingiva, which is often resected during general dental treatments and treated as biomedical waste, is an easily obtainable tissue, and cells can be isolated from patients with minimal discomfort. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 132 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 19% |
| Researcher | 25 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 32 | 23% |
| Unknown | 19 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 1% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 23 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2014.
All research outputs
#6,401,232
of 22,741,406 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#76,828
of 194,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,201
of 95,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#455
of 916 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,741,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 916 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.