↓ Skip to main content

The dynamics of resting fluctuations in the brain: metastability and its dynamical cortical core

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
49 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
404 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
422 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The dynamics of resting fluctuations in the brain: metastability and its dynamical cortical core
Published in
Scientific Reports, June 2017
DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-03073-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gustavo Deco, Morten L. Kringelbach, Viktor K. Jirsa, Petra Ritter

Abstract

In the human brain, spontaneous activity during resting state consists of rapid transitions between functional network states over time but the underlying mechanisms are not understood. We use connectome based computational brain network modeling to reveal fundamental principles of how the human brain generates large-scale activity observable by noninvasive neuroimaging. We used structural and functional neuroimaging data to construct whole- brain models. With this novel approach, we reveal that the human brain during resting state operates at maximum metastability, i.e. in a state of maximum network switching. In addition, we investigate cortical heterogeneity across areas. Optimization of the spectral characteristics of each local brain region revealed the dynamical cortical core of the human brain, which is driving the activity of the rest of the whole brain. Brain network modelling goes beyond correlational neuroimaging analysis and reveals non-trivial network mechanisms underlying non-invasive observations. Our novel findings significantly pertain to the important role of computational connectomics in understanding principles of brain function.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 422 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 420 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 96 23%
Researcher 78 18%
Student > Master 54 13%
Student > Bachelor 27 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 4%
Other 62 15%
Unknown 88 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 127 30%
Engineering 41 10%
Psychology 26 6%
Physics and Astronomy 21 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 5%
Other 62 15%
Unknown 124 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2021.
All research outputs
#735,136
of 25,260,058 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#7,985
of 139,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,340
of 323,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#241
of 4,132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,260,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 139,004 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.