You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Relationship between yield and mineral nutrient concentrations in historical and modern spring wheat cultivars
|
---|---|
Published in |
Euphytica, April 2008
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10681-008-9681-x |
Authors |
Kevin M. Murphy, Philip G. Reeves, Stephen S. Jones |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
United States | 1 | 17% |
Germany | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
Argentina | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 157 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 27 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 16% |
Student > Master | 21 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 6% |
Other | 27 | 17% |
Unknown | 36 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 88 | 55% |
Environmental Science | 7 | 4% |
Chemistry | 5 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
Engineering | 4 | 2% |
Other | 13 | 8% |
Unknown | 40 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2022.
All research outputs
#7,883,283
of 24,631,014 outputs
Outputs from Euphytica
#330
of 1,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,568
of 85,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Euphytica
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,631,014 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,195 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 85,531 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.