You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Fas ligand–mediated immune surveillance by T cells is essential for the control of spontaneous B cell lymphomas
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Medicine, February 2014
|
DOI | 10.1038/nm.3442 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shoukat Afshar-Sterle, Dimitra Zotos, Nicholas J Bernard, Anna K Scherger, Lisa Rödling, Amber E Alsop, Jennifer Walker, Frederick Masson, Gabrielle T Belz, Lynn M Corcoran, Lorraine A O'Reilly, Andreas Strasser, Mark J Smyth, Ricky Johnstone, David M Tarlinton, Stephen L Nutt, Axel Kallies |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 19% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 11% |
Spain | 2 | 5% |
Australia | 2 | 5% |
Saudi Arabia | 2 | 5% |
Brazil | 1 | 3% |
France | 1 | 3% |
Mexico | 1 | 3% |
New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 14 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 27 | 73% |
Scientists | 8 | 22% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 147 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 21% |
Researcher | 31 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 20 | 13% |
Student > Master | 18 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
Other | 21 | 14% |
Unknown | 22 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 24% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 22% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 20% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 24 | 16% |
Engineering | 2 | 1% |
Other | 3 | 2% |
Unknown | 22 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 122. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2022.
All research outputs
#349,059
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#1,268
of 9,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,262
of 324,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#10
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 105.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.