↓ Skip to main content

Behavioral Neurobiology of Depression and Its Treatment

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 212: The Use of Cognitive Bias Modification and Imagery in the Understanding and Treatment of Depression.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The Use of Cognitive Bias Modification and Imagery in the Understanding and Treatment of Depression.
Chapter number 212
Book title
Behavioral Neurobiology of Depression and Its Treatment
Published in
Current topics in behavioral neurosciences, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/7854_2012_212
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-235424-3, 978-3-64-235425-0
Authors

Browning M, Blackwell SE, Holmes EA, Michael Browning, Simon E. Blackwell, Emily A. Holmes, Browning, Michael, Blackwell, Simon E., Holmes, Emily A.

Editors

Philip J. Cowen, Trevor Sharp, Jennifer Y. F. Lau

Abstract

Cognitive models of depression form the natural link between neurobiological and social accounts of the illness. Interest in the role of cognition in depression has recently been stimulated by the advent of simple, computer-based "cognitive bias modification" (CBM) techniques which are able to experimentally alter cognitive habits in clinical and non-clinical populations. In this chapter, we review recent work which has used CBM techniques to address questions of aetiology and treatment in depression with a particular focus on the interface with neurobiological and social processes relevant to the illness. We find that there are early signs that CBM may be a useful tool in exploring the aetiology of depression, particularly in regard to the neural and genetic factors which influence susceptibility to the illness and response to treatment. There is also early evidence suggesting that CBM has promise in the treatment and prevention of depression. This work suggests that the beneficial effects of CBM are mediated by the interaction between cognitive functioning and environmental and social information. In summary, by providing a method for altering habitual cognitive function in experimental and clinical settings CBM techniques have begun to further the understanding of and the treatment for depression.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 18%
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 16 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 31 51%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 20 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2014.
All research outputs
#14,659,293
of 22,765,347 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in behavioral neurosciences
#295
of 488 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,249
of 163,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in behavioral neurosciences
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,765,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 488 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.