You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genome-wide co-localization of Polycomb orthologs and their effects on gene expression in human fibroblasts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2014-15-2-r23 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Helen Pemberton, Emma Anderton, Harshil Patel, Sharon Brookes, Hollie Chandler, Richard Palermo, Julie Stock, Marc Rodriguez-Niedenführ, Tomas Racek, Lucas de Breed, Aengus Stewart, Nik Matthews, Gordon Peters |
| Abstract |
Polycomb group proteins form multicomponent complexes that are important for establishing lineage-specific patterns of gene expression. Mammalian cells encode multiple permutations of the prototypic Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) with little evidence for functional specialization. An aim of this study is to determine whether the multiple orthologs that are co-expressed in human fibroblasts act on different target genes and whether their genomic location changes during cellular senescence. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 79 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 15 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 39% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 34% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 16 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2014.
All research outputs
#3,401,872
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#2,420
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,828
of 322,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#68
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.