↓ Skip to main content

Intravesical treatments for painful bladder syndrome/ interstitial cystitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intravesical treatments for painful bladder syndrome/ interstitial cystitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006113.pub2
Authors

Timothy E Dawson, Jim Jamison

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Panama 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 79 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 17%
Student > Master 14 16%
Other 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Unspecified 7 8%
Other 30 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 51%
Unspecified 8 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 6%
Other 16 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,569,003
of 13,457,898 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,222
of 10,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,270
of 268,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#131
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,457,898 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,600 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.