↓ Skip to main content

How chemotherapy damages the central nervous system

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biology, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How chemotherapy damages the central nervous system
Published in
Journal of Biology, January 2008
DOI 10.1186/jbiol73
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christina A Meyers

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Romania 1 1%
Unknown 78 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 19 23%
Unknown 1 1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 23%
Psychology 9 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Neuroscience 4 5%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 3 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2019.
All research outputs
#9,598,135
of 15,090,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biology
#88
of 112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,606
of 270,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,090,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 112 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.