↓ Skip to main content

Macrophages migrate in an activation-dependent manner to chemokines involved in neuroinflammation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroinflammation, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
126 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
249 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Macrophages migrate in an activation-dependent manner to chemokines involved in neuroinflammation
Published in
Journal of Neuroinflammation, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1742-2094-11-23
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daphne YS Vogel, Priscilla DAM Heijnen, Marjolein Breur, Helga E de Vries, Anton TJ Tool, Sandra Amor, Christine D Dijkstra

Abstract

In neuroinflammatory diseases, macrophages can play a dual role in the process of tissue damage, depending on their activation status (M1 / M2). M1 macrophages are considered to exert damaging effects to neurons, whereas M2 macrophages are reported to aid regeneration and repair of neurons. Their migration within the central nervous system may be of critical importance in the final outcome of neurodegeneration in neuroinflammatory diseases e.g. multiple sclerosis (MS). To provide insight into this process, we examined the migratory capacity of human monocyte-derived M1 and M2 polarised macrophages towards chemoattractants, relevant for neuroinflammatory diseases like MS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 243 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 30%
Student > Master 34 14%
Researcher 30 12%
Student > Bachelor 24 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 8%
Other 23 9%
Unknown 43 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 40 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 30 12%
Engineering 14 6%
Other 33 13%
Unknown 53 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2020.
All research outputs
#5,165,888
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#1,061
of 2,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,933
of 322,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#9
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.