↓ Skip to main content

Physical health care monitoring for people with serious mental illness

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 tweeters
weibo
1 weibo user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physical health care monitoring for people with serious mental illness
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008298.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Graeme Tosh, Andrew V Clifton, Jun Xia, Margueritte M White

Abstract

Current guidance suggests that we should monitor the physical health of people with serious mental illness, and there has been a significant financial investment over recent years to provide this.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 160 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 18%
Researcher 24 15%
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 11%
Student > Postgraduate 14 9%
Other 28 17%
Unknown 30 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 11%
Psychology 16 10%
Social Sciences 13 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 35 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,078,307
of 14,969,364 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,068
of 11,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,981
of 252,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#62
of 184 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,969,364 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,884 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 184 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.