You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Concomitant Socioeconomic, Behavioral, and Biological Factors Associated with the Disproportionate HIV Infection Burden among Black Men Who Have Sex with Men in 6 U.S. Cities
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0087298 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kenneth H. Mayer, Lei Wang, Beryl Koblin, Sharon Mannheimer, Manya Magnus, Carlos del Rio, Susan Buchbinder, Leo Wilton, Vanessa Cummings, Christopher C. Watson, Estelle Piwowar-Manning, Charlotte Gaydos, Susan H. Eshleman, William Clarke, Ting-Yuan Liu, Cherry Mao, Samuel Griffith, Darrell Wheeler, for the HPTN061 Protocol Team |
Abstract |
American Black men who have sex with men (MSM) are disproportionately affected by HIV, but the factors associated with this concentrated epidemic are not fully understood. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 56% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 5% |
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 135 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 30 | 21% |
Researcher | 25 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 7% |
Other | 9 | 6% |
Other | 25 | 17% |
Unknown | 27 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 22% |
Psychology | 21 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 21 | 15% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
Other | 12 | 8% |
Unknown | 37 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,353,501
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#17,780
of 194,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,744
of 306,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#565
of 5,625 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,093 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,625 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.