↓ Skip to main content

Adaptive Capacity: An Evolutionary Neuroscience Model Linking Exercise, Cognition, and Brain Health

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Neurosciences, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 2,495)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
18 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
137 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
5 Facebook pages
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
153 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
391 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adaptive Capacity: An Evolutionary Neuroscience Model Linking Exercise, Cognition, and Brain Health
Published in
Trends in Neurosciences, June 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.tins.2017.05.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

David A. Raichlen, Gene E. Alexander

Abstract

The field of cognitive neuroscience was transformed by the discovery that exercise induces neurogenesis in the adult brain, with the potential to improve brain health and stave off the effects of neurodegenerative disease. However, the basic mechanisms underlying exercise-brain connections are not well understood. We use an evolutionary neuroscience approach to develop the adaptive capacity model (ACM), detailing how and why physical activity improves brain function based on an energy-minimizing strategy. Building on studies showing a combined benefit of exercise and cognitive challenge to enhance neuroplasticity, our ACM addresses two fundamental questions: (i) what are the proximate and ultimate mechanisms underlying age-related brain atrophy, and (ii) how do lifestyle changes influence the trajectory of healthy and pathological aging?

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 137 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 391 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 391 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 65 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 14%
Student > Bachelor 45 12%
Researcher 39 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 7%
Other 70 18%
Unknown 90 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 63 16%
Psychology 52 13%
Sports and Recreations 29 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 7%
Other 79 20%
Unknown 115 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 267. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2024.
All research outputs
#137,074
of 25,641,627 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Neurosciences
#26
of 2,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,907
of 332,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Neurosciences
#1
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,641,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,495 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,371 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.