↓ Skip to main content

How the Cases You Choose Affect the Answers You Get: Selection Bias in Comparative Politics

Overview of attention for article published in Political Analysis, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
409 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1092 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How the Cases You Choose Affect the Answers You Get: Selection Bias in Comparative Politics
Published in
Political Analysis, January 2017
DOI 10.1093/pan/2.1.131
Authors

Barbara Geddes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,092 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 42 4%
Germany 11 1%
United Kingdom 8 <1%
Canada 4 <1%
Turkey 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Ireland 2 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Other 22 2%
Unknown 993 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 388 36%
Student > Master 154 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 99 9%
Researcher 81 7%
Student > Bachelor 68 6%
Other 170 16%
Unknown 132 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 785 72%
Business, Management and Accounting 25 2%
Arts and Humanities 25 2%
Environmental Science 24 2%
Engineering 19 2%
Other 66 6%
Unknown 148 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,754,067
of 25,813,008 outputs
Outputs from Political Analysis
#99
of 562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,740
of 424,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Political Analysis
#46
of 277 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,813,008 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 562 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 277 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.