You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Metapopulation Approach to African Lion (Panthera leo) Conservation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0088081 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephanie Dolrenry, Jennifer Stenglein, Leela Hazzah, R. Scott Lutz, Laurence Frank |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 19% |
| United States | 3 | 14% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| South Africa | 1 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 71% |
| Scientists | 6 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 239 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 15% |
| Researcher | 35 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 15% |
| Unknown | 32 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 107 | 43% |
| Environmental Science | 66 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 4% |
| Unknown | 38 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2018.
All research outputs
#1,140,892
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#14,512
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,372
of 328,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#426
of 5,709 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,709 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.