You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fast urinary screening of oligosaccharidoses by MALDI-TOF/TOF mass spectrometry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1750-1172-9-19 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laurent Bonesso, Monique Piraud, Céline Caruba, Emmanuel Van Obberghen, Raymond Mengual, Charlotte Hinault |
| Abstract |
Oligosaccharidoses, which belong to the lysosomal storage diseases, are inherited metabolic disorders due to the absence or the loss of function of one of the enzymes involved in the catabolic pathway of glycoproteins and indirectly of glycosphingolipids. This enzymatic deficiency typically results in the abnormal accumulation of uncompletely degraded oligosaccharides in the urine. Since the clinical features of many of these disorders are not specific for a single enzyme deficiency, unambiguous screening is critical to limit the number of costly enzyme assays which otherwise must be performed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 35 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 33% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 7 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2014.
All research outputs
#13,707,147
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,464
of 2,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,354
of 307,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#40
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,607 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.