↓ Skip to main content

Used-habitat calibration plots: a new procedure for validating species distribution, resource selection, and step-selection models

Overview of attention for article published in Ecography, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
101 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Used-habitat calibration plots: a new procedure for validating species distribution, resource selection, and step-selection models
Published in
Ecography, August 2017
DOI 10.1111/ecog.03123
Authors

John R. Fieberg, James D. Forester, Garrett M. Street, Douglas H. Johnson, Althea A. ArchMiller, Jason Matthiopoulos

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 101 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 186 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 43 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 22%
Student > Master 41 22%
Other 8 4%
Student > Bachelor 8 4%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 22 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 92 49%
Environmental Science 44 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 <1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 41 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2018.
All research outputs
#353,292
of 15,569,608 outputs
Outputs from Ecography
#88
of 1,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,638
of 271,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecography
#5
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,569,608 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,629 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.