↓ Skip to main content

Disseminated and late metastatic disease from nasal pit leiomyosarcoma after radical surgical resection. Case report of a singular presentation of a rare disease

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Sarcoma Research, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Disseminated and late metastatic disease from nasal pit leiomyosarcoma after radical surgical resection. Case report of a singular presentation of a rare disease
Published in
Clinical Sarcoma Research, June 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13569-017-0078-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Enrico Pinotti, Marta Sandini, Simone Famularo, Marta Jaconi, Fabrizio Romano, Luca Nespoli, Luca Gianotti

Abstract

Leiomyosarcoma of the head and neck is a rare cancer with high local aggressiveness. Radical surgery and adjuvant treatment offer the best chance for cure, nonetheless 5-years recurrence rate remains high. Despite international guidelines are available for soft tissue sarcomas, no recommendations are specifically endorsed for leiomyosarcoma of the head and neck, due to the rarity of its presentation and consequently scarcity of data on long-term outcome. A 50-year old woman, operated 10 years before for leiomyosarcoma of the nasal pit and with negative 5-years follow-up, was admitted to our ward for impairment of the hepatic function. Total-body CT scan detected multiple localizations at lungs, kidneys, pancreas, bones, muscles, lymph nodes and thyroid. The pathologic report after lung biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of metastasis from leiomyosarcoma and the patients was scheduled for first line chemo-radiotherapy. Despite adequate primary treatment, distant and disseminated metastatic disease may be not excluded in leiomyosarcoma of the head and neck.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 15%
Unspecified 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 6 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 23%
Unspecified 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Unknown 7 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2017.
All research outputs
#17,898,929
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Sarcoma Research
#75
of 104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,916
of 317,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Sarcoma Research
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.