You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Less favourable climates constrain demographic strategies in plants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecology Letters, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1111/ele.12794 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna M. Csergő, Roberto Salguero‐Gómez, Olivier Broennimann, Shaun R. Coutts, Antoine Guisan, Amy L. Angert, Erik Welk, Iain Stott, Brian J. Enquist, Brian McGill, Jens‐Christian Svenning, Cyrille Violle, Yvonne M. Buckley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 18% |
| Ireland | 7 | 11% |
| United States | 6 | 9% |
| Australia | 4 | 6% |
| Spain | 3 | 5% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 25 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 47% |
| Scientists | 29 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 225 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 47 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 37 | 16% |
| Unknown | 45 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 90 | 40% |
| Environmental Science | 62 | 27% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Unknown | 53 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2019.
All research outputs
#513,607
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Ecology Letters
#235
of 3,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,740
of 334,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology Letters
#3
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.