You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Erratum to: ExCAPE-DB: an integrated large scale dataset facilitating Big Data analysis in chemogenomics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Cheminformatics, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13321-017-0222-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jiangming Sun, Nina Jeliazkova, Vladimir Chupakhin, Jose-Felipe Golib-Dzib, Ola Engkvist, Lars Carlsson, Jörg Wegner, Hugo Ceulemans, Ivan Georgiev, Vedrin Jeliazkov, Nikolay Kochev, Thomas J. Ashby, Hongming Chen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Israel | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2017.
All research outputs
#15,660,793
of 23,885,338 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cheminformatics
#775
of 881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,553
of 320,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cheminformatics
#17
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,885,338 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 881 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.