↓ Skip to main content

Instrumentos de avaliação do aleitamento materno e seu uso na prática clínica

Overview of attention for article published in Revista gaucha de enfermagem, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Instrumentos de avaliação do aleitamento materno e seu uso na prática clínica
Published in
Revista gaucha de enfermagem, January 2017
DOI 10.1590/1983-1447.2017.01.64675
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bárbara Tideman Sartorio, Kelly Pereira Coca, Karla Oliveira Marcacine, Érika de Sá Vieira Abuchaim, Ana Cristina Freitas de Vilhena Abrão, Sartorio, Bárbara Tideman, Coca, Kelly Pereira, Marcacine, Karla Oliveira, Abuchaim, Érika de Sá Vieira, Abrão, Ana Cristina Freitas de Vilhena

Abstract

To identify breastfeeding assessment tools, their application in clinical practice, and their validation and cross-cultural adaptation. This is an integrative review of literature obtained from six databases and an online library, conducted from August 2014 to December 2015, without a temporal delimitation. We identified 19 assessment tools, of which 12 were validated and five were cross-culturally adapted. In terms of adaptation, the tools were used to assess the risk of early weaning (BAPT) and the perception/behaviour of mothers during nursing (BSES-SF and IIFAS). The identification of the available instruments and their indications for breastfeeding assessments can help health workers choose the ideal instrument, and qualify maternal and child care.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 21%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 15 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 14 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 26%
Psychology 2 4%
Materials Science 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 15 32%