You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Recommendations for exercise adherence measures in musculoskeletal settings: a systematic review and consensus meeting (protocol)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2046-4053-3-10 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Melanie A Holden, Kirstie L Haywood, Tanzila A Potia, Melanie Gee, Sionnadh McLean |
| Abstract |
Exercise programmes are frequently advocated for the management of musculoskeletal disorders; however, adherence is an important pre-requisite for their success. The assessment of exercise adherence requires the use of relevant and appropriate measures, but guidance for appropriate assessment does not exist. This research will identify and evaluate the quality and acceptability of all measures used to assess exercise adherence within a musculoskeletal setting, seeking to reach consensus for the most relevant and appropriate measures for application in research and/or clinical practice settings. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 80% |
| Japan | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 198 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 39 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 11% |
| Researcher | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 16% |
| Unknown | 51 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 46 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 20% |
| Sports and Recreations | 18 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Engineering | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 12% |
| Unknown | 58 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2015.
All research outputs
#7,208,477
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,273
of 2,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,578
of 315,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#12
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.