↓ Skip to main content

GvHD prophylaxis after single-unit reduced intensity conditioning cord blood transplantation in adults with acute leukemia

Overview of attention for article published in Bone Marrow Transplantation, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
GvHD prophylaxis after single-unit reduced intensity conditioning cord blood transplantation in adults with acute leukemia
Published in
Bone Marrow Transplantation, June 2017
DOI 10.1038/bmt.2017.116
Pubmed ID
Authors

S Terakura, Y Kuwatsuka, S Yamasaki, A Wake, J Kanda, Y Inamoto, S Mizuta, T Yamaguchi, N Uchida, Y Kouzai, N Aotsuka, H Ogawa, H Kanamori, K Nishiwaki, S Miyakoshi, M Onizuka, I Amano, T Fukuda, T Ichinohe, Y Atsuta, M Murata, T Teshima

Abstract

To investigate better GVHD prophylaxis in reduced intensity conditioning umbilical cord blood transplantation (RIC-UCBT), we compared transplant outcomes after UCBT among GvHD prophylaxes using the registry data. We selected patients transplanted for AML or ALL with a calcineurin inhibitor and methotrexate (MTX)/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) combination. A total of 748 first RIC-UCBT between 2000 and 2012 (MTX+ group, 446, MMF+ group, 302) were included. The cumulative incidence of neutrophil and platelet counts higher than 50 000/μL was significantly better in the MMF+ group (relative risk (RR), 1.55; P<0.001: RR, 1.34; P=0.003, respectively). In multivariate analyses, the risk of grade II-IV and III-IV acute GvHD was significantly higher in the MMF+ group than in the MTX+ group (RR, 1.75; P<0.001: RR, 1.97; P=0.004, respectively). In disease-specific analyses of AML, the risk of relapse of high-risk disease was significantly lower in the MMF+ group (RR, 0.69; P=0.009), whereas no significant difference was observed in the risk of relapse-free and overall survival in high-risk disease. In patients with standard-risk disease, no significant differences were noted in the risk of relapse or survival between the MTX+ and MMF+ groups. Collectively, these results suggest that MMF-containing prophylaxis may be preferable in RIC-UCBT, particularly for high-risk disease.Bone Marrow Transplantation advance online publication, 12 June 2017; doi:10.1038/bmt.2017.116.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 20%
Professor 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Lecturer 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 10 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 50%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2017.
All research outputs
#18,555,330
of 22,981,247 outputs
Outputs from Bone Marrow Transplantation
#3,200
of 3,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,034
of 317,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bone Marrow Transplantation
#36
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,981,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.