↓ Skip to main content

Scientific method: Statistical errors

Overview of attention for news story in Nature
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 65,170)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
547 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1112 Mendeley
citeulike
41 CiteULike
Title
Scientific method: Statistical errors
Published by
Nature, February 2014
DOI 10.1038/506150a
Pubmed ID
Authors

Regina Nuzzo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9,748 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 48 4%
United Kingdom 24 2%
Brazil 17 2%
Germany 13 1%
Japan 10 <1%
Spain 9 <1%
Sweden 8 <1%
Netherlands 8 <1%
France 8 <1%
Other 73 7%
Unknown 894 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 312 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 266 24%
Student > Master 109 10%
Other 73 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 72 6%
Other 280 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 316 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 148 13%
Unspecified 91 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 74 7%
Psychology 66 6%
Other 417 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7320. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2019.
All research outputs
#14
of 12,537,218 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#3
of 65,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1
of 243,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#1
of 928 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,537,218 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65,170 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 73.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 928 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.