↓ Skip to main content

A Declining CD4 Count and Diagnosis of HIV-Associated Hodgkin Lymphoma: Do Prior Clinical Symptoms and Laboratory Abnormalities Aid Diagnosis?

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Declining CD4 Count and Diagnosis of HIV-Associated Hodgkin Lymphoma: Do Prior Clinical Symptoms and Laboratory Abnormalities Aid Diagnosis?
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0087442
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ravindra K. Gupta, Michael Marks, Simon G. Edwards, Katie Smith, Katie Fletcher, Siow-Ming Lee, Alan Ramsay, Andrew J. Copas, Robert F. Miller

Abstract

The incidence of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) among HIV-infected individuals remains unchanged since the introduction of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). Recent epidemiological data suggest that CD4 count decline over a year is associated with subsequent diagnosis of HL. In an era of economic austerity monitoring the efficacy of cART by CD4 counts may no longer be required where CD4 count>350 cells/µl and viral load is suppressed (<50 copies/ml).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 20%
Professor 1 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Researcher 1 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 50%
Psychology 1 10%
Environmental Science 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2015.
All research outputs
#15,686,478
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#135,292
of 199,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,468
of 309,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,634
of 5,668 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,239 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,910 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,668 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.