↓ Skip to main content

Whales from Space: Counting Southern Right Whales by Satellite

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
36 news outlets
blogs
11 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
113 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
15 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
386 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Whales from Space: Counting Southern Right Whales by Satellite
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0088655
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter T. Fretwell, Iain J. Staniland, Jaume Forcada

Abstract

We describe a method of identifying and counting whales using very high resolution satellite imagery through the example of southern right whales breeding in part of the Golfo Nuevo, Península Valdés in Argentina. Southern right whales have been extensively hunted over the last 300 years and although numbers have recovered from near extinction in the early 20(th) century, current populations are fragmented and are estimated at only a small fraction of pre-hunting total. Recent extreme right whale calf mortality events at Península Valdés, which constitutes the largest single population, have raised fresh concern for the future of the species. The WorldView2 satellite has a maximum 50 cm resolution and a water penetrating coastal band in the far-blue part of the spectrum that allows it to see deeper into the water column. Using an image covering 113 km², we identified 55 probable whales and 23 other features that are possibly whales, with a further 13 objects that are only detected by the coastal band. Comparison of a number of classification techniques, to automatically detect whale-like objects, showed that a simple thresholding technique of the panchromatic and coastal band delivered the best results. This is the first successful study using satellite imagery to count whales; a pragmatic, transferable method using this rapidly advancing technology that has major implications for future surveys of cetacean populations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 113 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 386 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 1%
United States 4 1%
Argentina 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Other 8 2%
Unknown 358 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 81 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 70 18%
Student > Master 63 16%
Student > Bachelor 43 11%
Student > Postgraduate 19 5%
Other 55 14%
Unknown 55 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 157 41%
Environmental Science 78 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 31 8%
Engineering 11 3%
Computer Science 9 2%
Other 32 8%
Unknown 68 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 461. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2023.
All research outputs
#60,740
of 25,866,425 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#1,023
of 225,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#464
of 331,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#36
of 5,821 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,866,425 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,821 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.