↓ Skip to main content

A contribuição do farmacêutico para a promoção do acesso e uso racional de medicamentos essenciais no SUS

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A contribuição do farmacêutico para a promoção do acesso e uso racional de medicamentos essenciais no SUS
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, January 2017
DOI 10.1590/1413-81232017221.16202015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniela Oliveira de Melo, Lia Lusitana Cardozo de Castro

Abstract

to describe the pharmaceutical inclusion process in a Basic Health Unit multidisciplinary team and evaluate results related to rational use and promotion of access to essential medicines. This is a descriptive, cross-sectional study conducted in a primary care health unit in the city of São Paulo. Pharmacist's activities were evaluated regarding the service structure and organization and prescribing quality improvement, guidance method creation, and implementation of clinical pharmacy service. Data measured before and after the interventions and between 2010 and 2011 were analyzed using Pearson´s chi-square test with a significance level of 5%, and odds ratio. Pharmacist's activities had statistically significant result in drug shortage reduction; prescribing quality improvement associated with an increased proportion of prescriptions met; decrease in the total of prescribed drugs among patients receiving pharmacotherapeutic follow-up and, comparing the years 2010 and 2011, changes in the pharmacotherapy recommendations have gained increased acceptance level. Pharmacist's activities may effectively provide rational use and promotion of access to essential medicines.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 106 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 25%
Student > Master 12 11%
Researcher 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Student > Postgraduate 4 4%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 39 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 31 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 42 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2017.
All research outputs
#7,096,680
of 11,394,845 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#154
of 463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,425
of 263,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#7
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,394,845 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 463 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.