↓ Skip to main content

Induction of apoptosis through oxidative stress-related pathways in MCF-7, human breast cancer cells, by ethyl acetate extract of Dillenia suffruticosa

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Induction of apoptosis through oxidative stress-related pathways in MCF-7, human breast cancer cells, by ethyl acetate extract of Dillenia suffruticosa
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-14-55
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yin Sim Tor, Latifah Saiful Yazan, Jhi Biau Foo, Nurdin Armania, Yoke Kqueen Cheah, Rasedee Abdullah, Mustapha Umar Imam, Norsharina Ismail, Maznah Ismail

Abstract

Breast cancer is one of the most dreading types of cancer among women. Herbal medicine has becoming a potential source of treatment for breast cancer. Herbal plant Dillenia suffruticosa (Griff) Martelli under the family Dilleniaceae has been traditionally used to treat cancerous growth. In this study, the anticancer effect of ethyl acetate extract of D. suffruticosa (EADs) was examined on human breast adenocarcinoma cell line MCF-7 and the molecular pathway involved was elucidated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 103 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 19%
Student > Bachelor 18 17%
Student > Master 14 13%
Researcher 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 19 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 7%
Chemistry 7 7%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 25 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2015.
All research outputs
#14,773,697
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#1,832
of 3,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,324
of 314,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#51
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.