↓ Skip to main content

Role of Self-Reported Individual Differences in Preference for and Tolerance of Exercise Intensity in Fitness Testing Performance

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Role of Self-Reported Individual Differences in Preference for and Tolerance of Exercise Intensity in Fitness Testing Performance
Published in
Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, September 2014
DOI 10.1519/jsc.0000000000000420
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric E. Hall, Steven J. Petruzzello, Panteleimon Ekkekakis, Paul C. Miller, Walter R. Bixby

Abstract

Performance in fitness tests could depend on factors beyond the bioenergetic and skeletomuscular systems, such as individual differences in preference for and tolerance of different levels of exercise-induced somatosensory stimulation. Although such individual-difference variables could play a role in exercise testing and prescription, they have been understudied. The purpose of the present studies was to examine the relationships of self-reported preference for and tolerance of exercise intensity with performance in fitness tests. Participants in Study I were 516 men and women volunteers from a campus community and participants in Study II were 42 men recruit firefighters undergoing a six-week training program. Both the Preference and Tolerance scores exhibited significant relationships with performance in several fitness tests, as well as with body composition and physical activity participation. Preference and Tolerance did not change after the training program in Study II, despite improvements in objective and perceived fitness, supporting their conceptualization as dispositional traits. Preference and Tolerance scores could be useful not only in ameliorating the current understanding of the determinants of physical performance, but also in personalizing exercise prescriptions and, thus, delivering exercise experiences that are more pleasant, tolerable, and sustainable.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 96 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 16%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Professor 6 6%
Other 22 22%
Unknown 26 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 29 29%
Social Sciences 9 9%
Psychology 9 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 32 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2017.
All research outputs
#5,226,703
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
#3,197
of 6,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,264
of 248,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
#82
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,666 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.