You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
What do computer scientists tweet? Analyzing the link-sharing practice on Twitter
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2017
|
DOI | 10.5281/zenodo.580587 |
Authors |
Marco Schmitt, Robert Jäschke |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 21% |
Germany | 4 | 17% |
United States | 4 | 17% |
Spain | 1 | 4% |
Canada | 1 | 4% |
Portugal | 1 | 4% |
France | 1 | 4% |
Ecuador | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 6 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 18 | 75% |
Scientists | 3 | 13% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 100% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2017.
All research outputs
#1,359,324
of 24,666,614 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#17,305
of 213,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,357
of 321,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#386
of 4,194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,666,614 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 213,275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.