You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The “lung pulse”: an early ultrasound sign of complete atelectasis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, October 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-003-1930-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel A. Lichtenstein, Nathalie Lascols, Sébastien Prin, Gilbert Mezière |
| Abstract |
Complete atelectasis can be immediately generated by selective intubation. A dynamic lung ultrasound sign can be described as the association of absent lung sliding with the perception of heart activity at the pleural line, a sign which was called "lung pulse." We examined whether this sign be used promptly to confirm complete atelectasis due to selective intubation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 31% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Slovenia | 1 | 3% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
| Russia | 1 | 3% |
| Poland | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 11 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 59% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 26% |
| Scientists | 5 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 241 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 32 | 13% |
| Other | 30 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 30 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 61 | 24% |
| Unknown | 65 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 155 | 62% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 5 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Engineering | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 4% |
| Unknown | 70 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,345,375
of 25,983,475 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,213
of 5,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,365
of 57,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,983,475 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,544 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.