You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Untangling the web of opioid addictions in the USA
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Lancet, June 2017
|
DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31713-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
The Lancet |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 14 | 31% |
United Kingdom | 5 | 11% |
Mexico | 4 | 9% |
France | 2 | 4% |
Australia | 2 | 4% |
Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 1 | 2% |
Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
India | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 15 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 28 | 62% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 18% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 11% |
Scientists | 4 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 20 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 3 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 14% |
Lecturer | 2 | 10% |
Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
Other | 5 | 24% |
Unknown | 3 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 29% |
Psychology | 4 | 19% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 14% |
Unknown | 5 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2017.
All research outputs
#1,378,723
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#9,817
of 42,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,054
of 330,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#175
of 413 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 413 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.