You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Neural Substrates of Interactive Musical Improvisation: An fMRI Study of ‘Trading Fours’ in Jazz
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0088665 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gabriel F. Donnay, Summer K. Rankin, Monica Lopez-Gonzalez, Patpong Jiradejvong, Charles J. Limb |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 9% |
| India | 3 | 4% |
| Finland | 3 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Italy | 2 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Hungary | 1 | 1% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 31 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 52 | 76% |
| Scientists | 11 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 4% |
| Japan | 3 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 235 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 19% |
| Researcher | 35 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 8% |
| Other | 58 | 23% |
| Unknown | 32 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 73 | 29% |
| Neuroscience | 35 | 14% |
| Arts and Humanities | 34 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 43 | 17% |
| Unknown | 39 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 383. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2024.
All research outputs
#81,542
of 25,579,912 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#1,346
of 223,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#603
of 239,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#47
of 5,783 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,579,912 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,078 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,336 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,783 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.