You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Perception of Polyphony With Cochlear Implants for 2 and 3 Simultaneous Pitches
|
---|---|
Published in |
Otology & Neurotology, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1097/mao.0000000000000255 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Richard T. Penninger, Eugen Kludt, Charles J. Limb, Marc Leman, Ingeborg Dhooge, Andreas Buechner |
Abstract |
It was hypothesized that cochlear implant (CI) subjects would be able to correctly identify 1, 2, and 3 simultaneous pitches through direct electrical stimulation. We further hypothesized that the location on the implant array and the fundamental frequency of the pitches would have an impact on the performance. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Greece | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 36 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 6 | 16% |
Researcher | 6 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
Other | 9 | 24% |
Unknown | 7 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 24% |
Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 8% |
Computer Science | 3 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Psychology | 2 | 5% |
Other | 8 | 22% |
Unknown | 10 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2014.
All research outputs
#16,722,190
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Otology & Neurotology
#1,883
of 3,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,394
of 236,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Otology & Neurotology
#34
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,960 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.