↓ Skip to main content

Text Message Intervention Designs to Promote Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy (ART): A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
9 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
318 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
333 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Text Message Intervention Designs to Promote Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy (ART): A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0088166
Pubmed ID
Authors

David J. Finitsis, Jennifer A. Pellowski, Blair T. Johnson

Abstract

The efficacy of antiretroviral therapy depends on patient adherence to a daily medication regimen, yet many patients fail to adhere at high enough rates to maintain health and reduce the risk of transmitting HIV. Given the explosive global growth of cellular-mobile phone use, text-messaging interventions to promote adherence are especially appropriate. This meta-analysis synthesized available text messaging interventions to promote antiretroviral therapy adherence in people living with HIV.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 333 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 325 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 71 21%
Student > Master 50 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 13%
Student > Bachelor 28 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 6%
Other 58 17%
Unknown 63 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 100 30%
Social Sciences 43 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 11%
Psychology 21 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 3%
Other 43 13%
Unknown 81 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,100,927
of 24,495,755 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#14,364
of 211,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,527
of 317,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#431
of 5,629 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,495,755 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 211,514 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,629 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.