↓ Skip to main content

Species-specific bioluminescence facilitates speciation in the deep sea

Overview of attention for article published in Marine Biology, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
26 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
234 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Species-specific bioluminescence facilitates speciation in the deep sea
Published in
Marine Biology, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00227-014-2406-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew P. Davis, Nancy I. Holcroft, Edward O. Wiley, John S. Sparks, W. Leo Smith

Abstract

The vast darkness of the deep sea is an environment with few obvious genetic isolating barriers, and little is known regarding the macroevolutionary processes that have shaped present-day biodiversity in this habitat. Bioluminescence, the production and emission of light from a living organism through a chemical reaction, is thought to occur in approximately 80 % of the eukaryotic life that inhabits the deep sea (water depth greater than 200 m). In this study, we show, for the first time, that deep-sea fishes that possess species-specific bioluminescent structures (e.g., lanternfishes, dragonfishes) are diversifying into new species at a more rapid rate than deep-sea fishes that utilize bioluminescence in ways that would not promote isolation of populations (e.g., camouflage, predation). This work adds to our understanding of how life thrives and evolution shaped present-day biodiversity in the deep sea, the largest and arguably least explored habitat on earth.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 226 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 60 26%
Student > Master 39 17%
Researcher 32 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 41 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 116 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 11%
Environmental Science 20 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 5%
Computer Science 2 <1%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 45 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2023.
All research outputs
#641,281
of 24,987,787 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#60
of 3,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,007
of 230,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#3
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,987,787 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.