You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of Transverse Aortic Constriction on Cardiac Structure, Function and Gene Expression in Pregnant Rats
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0089559 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nils Thomas Songstad, David Johansen, Ole-Jacob How, Per Ivar Kaaresen, Kirsti Ytrehus, Ganesh Acharya |
| Abstract |
There is an increased risk of heart failure and pulmonary edema in pregnancies complicated by hypertensive disorders. However, in a previous study we found that pregnancy protects against fibrosis and preserves angiogenesis in a rat model of angiotensin II induced cardiac hypertrophy. In this study we test the hypothesis that pregnancy protects against negative effects of increased afterload. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 3 | 60% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 39 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 28% |
| Researcher | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 21% |
| Unknown | 6 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 19% |
| Engineering | 5 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 9% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2014.
All research outputs
#6,390,643
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#76,817
of 194,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,041
of 224,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,021
of 5,782 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,782 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.