You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evidence for crustal degassing of CF4 and SF6 in Mojave Desert groundwaters
|
---|---|
Published in |
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, February 2008
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.gca.2007.11.027 |
Authors |
Daniel A. Deeds, Martin K. Vollmer, Justin T. Kulongoski, Benjamin R. Miller, Jens Mühle, Christina M. Harth, John A. Izbicki, David R. Hilton, Ray F. Weiss |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 53 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 16 | 29% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 18% |
Professor | 6 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
Other | 8 | 15% |
Unknown | 5 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 18 | 33% |
Environmental Science | 12 | 22% |
Chemistry | 5 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 5% |
Unknown | 14 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2016.
All research outputs
#2,416,570
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
#221
of 4,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,205
of 172,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
#4
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,219 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.