↓ Skip to main content

Signal and Image Analysis for Biomedical and Life Sciences

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Signal and Image Analysis for Biomedical and Life Sciences'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Visual Analytics of Signalling Pathways Using Time Profiles
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Modeling of testosterone regulation by pulse-modulated feedback.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Hybrid Algorithms for Multiple Change-Point Detection in Biological Sequences
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Stochastic anomaly detection in eye-tracking data for quantification of motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Identification of the Reichardt Elementary Motion Detector Model
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Multi-complexity Ensemble Measures for Gait Time Series Analysis: Application to Diagnostics, Monitoring and Biometrics.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Development of a motion capturing and load analyzing system for caregivers aiding a patient to sit up in bed.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Classifying Epileptic EEG Signals with Delay Permutation Entropy and Multi-scale K-Means.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Tracking of EEG Activity Using Motion Estimation to Understand Brain Wiring.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Towards Automated Quantitative Vasculature Understanding via Ultra High-Resolution Imagery.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Cloud based toolbox for image analysis, processing and reconstruction tasks.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Pollen image classification using the classifynder system: algorithm comparison and a case study on new zealand honey.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Digital image processing and analysis for activated sludge wastewater treatment.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 A Complete System for 3D Reconstruction of Roots for Phenotypic Analysis
Attention for Chapter 4: Stochastic anomaly detection in eye-tracking data for quantification of motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Stochastic anomaly detection in eye-tracking data for quantification of motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease.
Chapter number 4
Book title
Signal and Image Analysis for Biomedical and Life Sciences
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-10984-8_4
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-910983-1, 978-3-31-910984-8
Authors

Daniel Jansson, Alexander Medvedev, Hans Axelson, Dag Nyholm

Editors

Changming Sun, Tomasz Bednarz, Tuan D. Pham, Pascal Vallotton, Dadong Wang

Abstract

Two methods for distinguishing between healthy controls and patients diagnosed with Parkinson's disease by means of recorded smooth pursuit eye movements are presented and evaluated. Both methods are based on the principles of stochastic anomaly detection and make use of orthogonal series approximation for probability distribution estimation. The first method relies on the identification of a Wiener model of the smooth pursuit system and attempts to find statistically significant differences between the estimated parameters in healthy controls and patients with Parkinson's disease. The second method applies the same statistical method to distinguish between the gaze trajectories of healthy and Parkinson subjects tracking visual stimuli. Both methods show promising results, where healthy controls and patients with Parkinson's disease are effectively separated in terms of the considered metric. The results are preliminary because of the small number of participating test subjects, but they are indicative of the potential of the presented methods as diagnosing or staging tools for Parkinson's disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 21%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Postgraduate 3 13%
Professor 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 6 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 13%
Neuroscience 2 8%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 6 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2014.
All research outputs
#13,720,884
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,973
of 4,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,220
of 255,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#20
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,929 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.