You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pinus halepensis M. versus Quercus ilex subsp. Rotundifolia L. runoff and soil erosion at pedon scale under natural rainfall in Eastern Spain three decades after a forest fire
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Forest Ecology & Management, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.06.038 |
| Authors |
Artemi Cerdà, Manuel Esteban Lucas Borja, Xavier Úbeda, Juan Francisco Martínez-Murillo, Saskia Keesstra |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 40% |
| Ireland | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 20 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 13 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 17% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 11% |
| Engineering | 4 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 27 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2017.
All research outputs
#13,044,767
of 22,982,639 outputs
Outputs from Forest Ecology & Management
#3,164
of 5,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,519
of 316,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forest Ecology & Management
#43
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,982,639 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,181 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.