↓ Skip to main content

Exploring the experience of children with disabilities at school settings in Vietnam context

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploring the experience of children with disabilities at school settings in Vietnam context
Published in
SpringerPlus, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/2193-1801-3-103
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kham V Tran

Abstract

The initial findings from 230 questionnaires' survey and 36 interviews, in which informants are CWD, children with non-disabilities (CWND), parents of CWD, and teachers in school settings, are stated as: (a) the general understanding of disability is based on medical model and individual model rather than social model, such understandings contribute great impacts to the CWD's experiences in their daily life in general and in school contexts in particular; (b) the most important difficulties which CWD experience at school are those of learning facilities, the empathy from their student peers and barriers in the physical environment; (c) the ways which CWD try to deal with such difficulties are mostly 'do-by-themselves' or try to adapt themselves rather than asking for supports actively. Based on these findings, recommendations for having further activities to change social awareness of disabilities, specific support structures for CWD and school staff are stated in order to promote the social inclusion of CWD in schools.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 35%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 16 43%
Psychology 5 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 11%
Arts and Humanities 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 5 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2014.
All research outputs
#2,090,541
of 9,149,863 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#269
of 1,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,041
of 179,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#6
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,149,863 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,680 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.