You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diagnosis and treatment of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) according to four DIC guidelines
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Intensive Care, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2052-0492-2-15 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hideo Wada, Takeshi Matsumoto, Yoshiki Yamashita |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 23% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 8% |
| Peru | 1 | 8% |
| Kuwait | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 23% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 428 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 424 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 64 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 50 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 10% |
| Other | 37 | 9% |
| Researcher | 34 | 8% |
| Other | 71 | 17% |
| Unknown | 130 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 189 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 30 | 7% |
| Unknown | 141 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,172,111
of 23,983,367 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#104
of 537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,407
of 227,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,983,367 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,663 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.