Climate change will hurt conservatives more than liberals and hurt local economies in conservative areas more than in liberal ones. If you're an editor at a conservative outlet who won't cover climate because it's politically unpopular, you're failing. ht
@msroberts0619 The costs of doing NOTHING about manmade climate change are known, based on current observations and known economics: https://t.co/q66OcIoZ8B https://t.co/zKwqhvjqHq https://t.co/Rv6uoKszXt https://t.co/iSv7YgEiwi https://t.co/xh7eEWyJf
@cathmckenna @ScottWx_TWN The costs of doing NOTHING about manmade climate change are known, based on current observations and known economics: https://t.co/q66OcIoZ8B https://t.co/zKwqhvjqHq https://t.co/Rv6uoKszXt https://t.co/iSv7YgEiwi https://t.c
@DoctorVive The costs of doing NOTHING about manmade climate change are known, based on current observations and known economics: https://t.co/q66OcIoZ8B https://t.co/zKwqhvjqHq https://t.co/Rv6uoKszXt https://t.co/iSv7YgEiwi https://t.co/xh7eEWyJfz
@CupoJoeBlow It bothers me that your only concern with the future is to price it out to see if it's worth bothering to save. Yet we KNOW the costs of INACTION already: https://t.co/q66OcIoZ8B https://t.co/zKwqhvjqHq https://t.co/Rv6uoKszXt https://t.co
RT @ScienceNotDogma: @jessphoenix2018 The costs of doing nothing about manmade climate change are unaffordable, just based on current knowl…
“Smart” and “climate” are code words for being taken for a ride.
@jessphoenix2018 The costs of doing nothing about manmade climate change are unaffordable, just based on current knowledge: https://t.co/q66OcIoZ8B https://t.co/zKwqhvjqHq https://t.co/Rv6uoKszXt https://t.co/iSv7YgEiwi https://t.co/xh7eEWyJfz We don
RT @mcsardo: In a paper in @sciencemagazine in 2017, Solomon Hsiang et al. find that "Southern and Midwestern populations suffer the larges…
Estimating economic damage from climate change in the United States. - PubMed - NCBI https://t.co/VKXwR08dqf
@cathmckenna The costs of doing NOTHING about manmade climate change are known, based on current observations and known economics: https://t.co/q66OcIoZ8B https://t.co/zKwqhvjqHq https://t.co/Rv6uoKszXt https://t.co/iSv7YgEiwi https://t.co/xh7eEWyJfz
RT @impact_lab: Our research shows how #climatechange could exacerbate income inequality in the US https://t.co/MlTEceDXjk
Our research shows how #climatechange could exacerbate income inequality in the US
@PoliticalBones @AppleheadEmma @GeraldKutney The costs of doing zip about manmade climate change are known, based on current observations and known economics: https://t.co/q66OcIoZ8B https://t.co/zKwqhvjqHq https://t.co/Rv6uoKszXt https://t.co/iSv7YgEi
RT @JECDems: A 2017 study shows US GDP will decline by 1.2% for every degree of additional warming the planet undergoes. #ClimateCosts #cli…
RT @JECDems: A 2017 study shows US GDP will decline by 1.2% for every degree of additional warming the planet undergoes. #ClimateCosts #cli…
@cookglads @mtnman0038 @ThomasBeyer @clivehbest @alan_poirier @EcoSenseNow Re: "effect to Global GDP is 0.003% per annum" Nope. "The combined value of market and nonmarket damage … increases quadratically in global mean temperature, costing roughly 1.2%
@FR_Conversation ainsi, un article de @sciencemagazine présentait une approche d'estimation de l'impact #économique du #changementclimatique aux US. Plus d'impact sur les populations défavorisées 🔜 renforcement des inégalités ! https://t.co/3Ay7ph3B8I
A 2017 study shows US GDP will decline by 1.2% for every degree of additional warming the planet undergoes. #ClimateCosts #climatechange. That year, 1.2% of US GDP was $233B. https://t.co/f1Y1t66OVj
A new study shows US GDP will decline by 1.2% for every degree of additional warming the planet undergoes. #ClimateCosts #climatechange. In 2017, 1.2% of US GDP was $233B. https://t.co/f1Y1t66OVj
@JECDems @UofCalifornia This study is from @impact_lab — a collaboration of climate scientists & economists from Berkeley, as well as Rutgers, U Chicago & Rhodium Group
Research published in @sciencemagazine in 2017 suggests that in the US, rising temperatures will result in a transfer of wealth from poor counties in the Southeast to wealthier counties in the Northeast, Midwest, and Pacific Northwest. https://t.co/cvW4J8J
@micaeljohnstone @BjornLomborg It’s projected to impact the US GDP by 1-3% in 80 years. https://t.co/CJ38EVuGSf
RT @ScienceNotDogma: @PaulEDawson The costs of doing NOTHING about manmade climate change are known, based on current observations and know…
@GerardPinzone @ScottAdamsSays Re: "Higher CO2 levels are a net benefit to humans." Doubtful. Higher CO₂ means higher temperatures, and ... "[D]amage ... increases quadratically in global mean temperature, costing roughly 1.2% of gross domestic product p
@tonytremain CO₂ fertilization improves plant growth, but warming reduces it, and warming dominates. "Accounting for estimated effects of CO₂ fertilization...and precipitation, warming still dominates, reducing national yields..." https://t.co/m2CsjZRnfJ
RT @ScienceNotDogma: @PaulEDawson The costs of doing NOTHING about manmade climate change are known, based on current observations and know…
RT @ScienceNotDogma: @PaulEDawson The costs of doing NOTHING about manmade climate change are known, based on current observations and know…
@PaulEDawson The costs of doing NOTHING about manmade climate change are known, based on current observations and known economics: https://t.co/q66OcIoZ8B https://t.co/zKwqhvjqHq https://t.co/Rv6uoKszXt https://t.co/iSv7YgEiwi https://t.co/xh7eEWyJfz
@xrwsm @ExtinctionR Capitalism can't afford the effects of manmade climate change, based on current observations and known economics: https://t.co/q66OcIoZ8B https://t.co/zKwqhvjqHq https://t.co/Rv6uoKszXt https://t.co/iSv7YgEiwi https://t.co/xh7eEWyJ
@JustinTrudeau @intactinsurance The costs of doing NOTHING about manmade climate change are known, based on current observations and known economics: https://t.co/q66OcIoZ8B https://t.co/zKwqhvjqHq https://t.co/Rv6uoKszXt https://t.co/iSv7YgEiwi https
@sciam The costs of doing NOTHING about manmade climate change are known, based on current observations and known economics: https://t.co/q66OcIoZ8B https://t.co/zKwqhvjqHq https://t.co/Rv6uoKszXt https://t.co/iSv7YgEiwi https://t.co/xh7eEWyJfz The a
RT @AlexSteffen: Oh, right: "In terms of overall effects on gross domestic product, the authors predict negative impacts in the southern Un…
RT @AlexSteffen: Oh, right: "In terms of overall effects on gross domestic product, the authors predict negative impacts in the southern Un…
RT @AlexSteffen: Oh, right: "In terms of overall effects on gross domestic product, the authors predict negative impacts in the southern Un…
Oh, right: "In terms of overall effects on gross domestic product, the authors predict negative impacts in the southern United States and positive impacts in some parts of the Pacific Northwest and New England." https://t.co/ulnfmE4G1p
@IHasTrees @bird_gang18 @AngelaBelcamino @AOC SCIENCE is the article below while I presume you’re just a climate denier feel free to rebut: @GoldmanSchool @UCBerkeley @nberpubs @RutgersU @UChicago @rhodium_group @WilsonSchool @Princeton @RiskManage
RT @drpeternagel: 2/ Es wird bereits jetzt deutlich, dass der Klimawandel die sozialen Themen des 21. Jahrhunderts massiv verstärken wird.…
@FDavis517 @drvox @KateAronoff Do you have that study? Climate change is estimated to cost 1%-3% of US GDP in 80 years. Not good, but hardly "annihilation" especially since income will likely quadruple by that time. What policies can stop climate change
RT @drpeternagel: 3/ Climate change will aggravate economic inequality in the United States, essentially transferring wealth from poor coun…
RT @drpeternagel: 3/ Climate change will aggravate economic inequality in the United States, essentially transferring wealth from poor coun…
RT @annia: Most of us don’t think like economists. We don’t calculate opportunity cost. But oh, does it have a price tag. Economists Solom…
RT @annia: Most of us don’t think like economists. We don’t calculate opportunity cost. But oh, does it have a price tag. Economists Solom…
RT @annia: Most of us don’t think like economists. We don’t calculate opportunity cost. But oh, does it have a price tag. Economists Solom…
RT @annia: Most of us don’t think like economists. We don’t calculate opportunity cost. But oh, does it have a price tag. Economists Solom…
RT @annia: Most of us don’t think like economists. We don’t calculate opportunity cost. But oh, does it have a price tag. Economists Solom…
RT @mcsardo: In a paper in @sciencemagazine in 2017, Solomon Hsiang et al. find that "Southern and Midwestern populations suffer the larges…
RT @mcsardo: In a paper in @sciencemagazine in 2017, Solomon Hsiang et al. find that "Southern and Midwestern populations suffer the larges…
RT @mcsardo: In a paper in @sciencemagazine in 2017, Solomon Hsiang et al. find that "Southern and Midwestern populations suffer the larges…
RT @mcsardo: In a paper in @sciencemagazine in 2017, Solomon Hsiang et al. find that "Southern and Midwestern populations suffer the larges…
RT @mcsardo: In a paper in @sciencemagazine in 2017, Solomon Hsiang et al. find that "Southern and Midwestern populations suffer the larges…
RT @mcsardo: In a paper in @sciencemagazine in 2017, Solomon Hsiang et al. find that "Southern and Midwestern populations suffer the larges…
In a paper in @sciencemagazine in 2017, Solomon Hsiang et al. find that "Southern and Midwestern populations suffer the largest losses, while Northern and Western populations have smaller or even negative damages" of climate change (1363) https://t.co/oDu6
@maxo531 @rolferd Hi Max, that is a common myth (often accompanied by unscientific figures ;). Pls have the courtesy to update your understanding here: https://t.co/0v5KgXuiL6 then for more details on the economics, please read: https://t.co/sKWSaptkgr and
This just made my reading list- https://t.co/JUs4ceP89a
RT @tan123: We've been emitting CO2 for a long time now, and ag yields are way up. When is your imagined CO2-induced agriculture apocalypse…
RT @tan123: We've been emitting CO2 for a long time now, and ag yields are way up. When is your imagined CO2-induced agriculture apocalypse…
@USRepGaryPalmer Let's start with economic impacts: https://t.co/gztlXV4Dle This peer-reviewed article, published in the journal Science, is a great start. #climatechangeimpacts
@snaidunl @arindube @mileskimball Spending 2% of GDP on costs of a carbon tax is a great deal and I have no idea why this article is written with such consternation. https://t.co/f7SjLjdimL
RT @tan123: We've been emitting CO2 for a long time now, and ag yields are way up. When is your imagined CO2-induced agriculture apocalypse…
RT @tan123: We've been emitting CO2 for a long time now, and ag yields are way up. When is your imagined CO2-induced agriculture apocalypse…
RT @tan123: We've been emitting CO2 for a long time now, and ag yields are way up. When is your imagined CO2-induced agriculture apocalypse…
RT @tan123: We've been emitting CO2 for a long time now, and ag yields are way up. When is your imagined CO2-induced agriculture apocalypse…
RT @tan123: We've been emitting CO2 for a long time now, and ag yields are way up. When is your imagined CO2-induced agriculture apocalypse…
RT @tan123: We've been emitting CO2 for a long time now, and ag yields are way up. When is your imagined CO2-induced agriculture apocalypse…
RT @tan123: We've been emitting CO2 for a long time now, and ag yields are way up. When is your imagined CO2-induced agriculture apocalypse…
RT @GreatLakesPeck: + on the other hand, MI comes out looking like a big relative winner wrt to climate change. The southern tier and easte…
RT @GreatLakesPeck: + at a recent talk, someone asked me why some counties in MI have more projected economic impacts than others. The main…
RT @GreatLakesPeck: This study shows the winner and looser counties, in terms of economic impacts, for some aspects of climate change impac…
RT @tan123: We've been emitting CO2 for a long time now, and ag yields are way up. When is your imagined CO2-induced agriculture apocalypse…
RT @tan123: We've been emitting CO2 for a long time now, and ag yields are way up. When is your imagined CO2-induced agriculture apocalypse…
RT @tan123: We've been emitting CO2 for a long time now, and ag yields are way up. When is your imagined CO2-induced agriculture apocalypse…
+ on the other hand, MI comes out looking like a big relative winner wrt to climate change. The southern tier and eastern US/Gulf coasts are the biggest losers. Extreme heat will likely drive human mortality up in some regions too. https://t.co/lmvhXQ2EyC
Estimating economic damage from climate change in the United States https://t.co/8vVLxy7iFV
We've been emitting CO2 for a long time now, and ag yields are way up. When is your imagined CO2-induced agriculture apocalypse going to arrive? Spoiler alert: Never.
+ at a recent talk, someone asked me why some counties in MI have more projected economic impacts than others. The main reason is that agriculture likely will get hit hardest, as you can see here. https://t.co/lmvhXQ2EyC https://t.co/Yewl6DYj50
This study shows the winner and looser counties, in terms of economic impacts, for some aspects of climate change impacts - not including running low on water in the SW or sea level rise impacts on Gulf or Atlantic coasts. https://t.co/lmvhXQ2EyC https://t
Chris Field also shared data from Hsiang et al. (2017), Estimating economic damage from climate change in the United States, in @sciencemagazine https://t.co/v4vaDXVjmd #AAASmtg #climatechange #ClimateFriday
@JohnCarltonKing @ZachWeiner @RealPaulWingate @kirkenstrom Also, if you're interested in inequality and climate change in the US, here's a really good study! https://t.co/45k8nYlwQF
Estimating economic damage from climate change in the United States https://t.co/tSfR1eWgNR
@wsscherk @ScottAdamsSays @JSegor @realdeepdives @AtomsksSanakan @luvkit Comparing to maybe 2-3 *full* % GDP loss thru 2100 "roughly 1.2% of gross domestic product per +1°C on average" https://t.co/zTxywwCqaZ And that's considering nothing of preservation
RT @bobkopp: @KenCaldeira @ClimateFran @jaburney @peteirvine Sorry, it was the big @impact_lab Science paper from 2017: https://t.co/tYj1EJ…
@KenCaldeira @ClimateFran @jaburney @peteirvine Sorry, it was the big @impact_lab Science paper from 2017: https://t.co/tYj1EJTnJW
Issue no 1: This article links to another article in Brookings, then another article in impactlab, which then finally points to the source in Science: https://t.co/vGI0jw7RzC The source is over a year old and open access, so there is no reason to link to
@JohnFugelsang Come out to the PNW :) Oddly we win when it comes to global warming. #leftcoast #whenitsuckstowin #everyoneloses https://t.co/8cTi0WOOWD
@realDonaldTrump Here's an article you might find helpful to understand climate change's impact to our country. As an astute politician you must notice a tremendous percentage of your voter base will be adversely affected. Maybe it's time to take this issu
@FataMorgana_LS @jerry_jtaylor Here is the paper. As always for economics papers only part of the economy is considered. "agriculture, crime, coastal storms, energy, human mortality, and labor" https://t.co/UuzEu9BFNg
Ref: Estimating economic damage from climate change in the United States https://t.co/C179LegM4M #studies #science #climate #reality #economics #economy #FutureGenerations
Estimating economic damage from climate change in the United States https://t.co/53riTqjTsc
Estimating economic damage from climate change in the United States https://t.co/EkW5xSQpET
Researchers also found that the risks of damages were unequally distributed geographically across the U.S. and that poorer counties were likely to experience expensive damages relative to their incomes. https://t.co/IMfonZS6tK #IPSS2019
Sharp investigative work by @afreedma tracking down origin of stat used in NCA4 https://t.co/0hg3sDr1qj. Despite claims to contrary, stat based on facts, may even underestimate negative impacts of climate change on U.S. economy https://t.co/ccw4UGE8pX @sci
RT @greenprofgreen: Libs get drawn into debating the costs of #carbonpricing when they should instead be talking about the costs of #climat…
Exactly. Hey Libs! Listen to @greenprofgreen !
RT @greenprofgreen: Libs get drawn into debating the costs of #carbonpricing when they should instead be talking about the costs of #climat…
@AndrewDessler I realized I should clarify - the cutting-edge study is the one that the graph came from here: https://t.co/RYChoWWSqB
This thread on the economic costs of climate change.