Study estimates economic damage due to #climate change in USA. Top 3 states affected: FL could lose $100.9 billion in GDP, TX could lose $100.7 billion, and CA could lose $60 billion @ScienceMagazine https://t.co/pbQHBVfZzh
RT @AGUSciPolicy: Study estimates economic damage due to #climate change in USA. Top 3 states affected: FL could lose $100.9 billion in GDP…
Study estimates economic damage due to #climate change in USA. Top 3 states affected: FL could lose $100.9 billion in GDP, TX could lose $100.7 billion, and CA could lose $60 billion @ScienceMagazine https://t.co/Prl7bEBTXZ
@kennerlyj1 Not exactly sure, but the researchers behind the study are pretty legit https://t.co/g1vo8IGcxS
An interesting counterpoint to enthusiasm for tax policy in Texas and Florida is how climate change, which CA is trying to prepare for, is expected to cost TX & FL economies $100bn apiece, under some scenarios https://t.co/5oUDzpyMz1 https://t.co/CierE
A new study from @sciencemagazine shows that Florida and Texas are the two states expected to suffer the greatest economic damage from climate change, as both states are projected to lose $100B in GDP https://t.co/NS9z1bleB5
@FranValverdeS @ingebau @drovia @Galan_75 Mitigar las causas del cambio climatico es mas barato que mitigar los efectos. El mercado no puede seguir ignorandolo https://t.co/JyIf5BX2SA
Hadn't seen this, but great effort. Suggests most economic damage due to climate change comes from increased mortality, so should we be helping people prepare for more heat stress? https://t.co/HvhGcCtoEa
Estimating economic damage from climate change in the United States https://t.co/kOS8l4fES8
@RobertEmberson @AlexSteffen Details here: https://t.co/ELvbBS4Psz
@BjornLomborg Not horrible on average, but aggregate number masks the greater impact on poor regions. Damage estimates by US county under RCP8.5 (90% confidence): Richest third: -1.2 — 6.8% Poorest third: 2.0 — 19.6% https://t.co/PluC2gNTl6 https://t.co/
RT @WaterPotential: Bigger picture: If we continue approving projects like #ACPipeline, economic damages from climate change will dwarf eve…
RT @WaterPotential: Bigger picture: If we continue approving projects like #ACPipeline, economic damages from climate change will dwarf eve…
RT @WaterPotential: Bigger picture: If we continue approving projects like #ACPipeline, economic damages from climate change will dwarf eve…
Bigger picture: If we continue approving projects like #ACPipeline, economic damages from climate change will dwarf every figure in this discussion. A major 2017 study estimates NC's damages at ~$10B/yr (2012 dollars) by end of the century. https://t.co/hl
@MLiebreich @NatGeo I also cited another study published in Science and interviewed the author who estimated climate change costing US "roughly 1.2% of gross domestic product per +1°C on average" so approx $220 billion https://t.co/C2NZRtesmr
@latimeralder @Deborah04315412 @IanMFish Here's a good paper on estimated costs of climate change: Hsiang et al, SCIENCE, July 26, 2017 https://t.co/PluC2gNTl6 It's free only to @aaas members (I am a member), but here's the data that supports it: https://
@RogerPielkeJr I am assuming that a heat wave is not considered to be a weather-related disaster. But the biggest "economic" loss projections come from heat-related mortality (converted to $ with the "statistical value of a life"), according to Hsiang et a
RT @impact_lab: At #55 -- Estimating Economic Damage from Climate Change in the United States: https://t.co/TVeVxx3zXw https://t.co/YUDIhnY…
RT @impact_lab: At #55 -- Estimating Economic Damage from Climate Change in the United States: https://t.co/TVeVxx3zXw https://t.co/YUDIhnY…
At #55 -- Estimating Economic Damage from Climate Change in the United States: https://t.co/TVeVxx3zXw https://t.co/YUDIhnYQYS
@PeterGleick @Jeff_Jacoby @BostonGlobe Shoddy writing. His claimed "benefits from climate change" are the opposite of benefits. temperature deaths - increased crops - reduced energy demand - increased gains - far outweighed by losses https://t.co/nXANRK
The economic effects of climate change are distributed unequally with southern/western areas being impacted more than northern/eastern. https://t.co/STjp6q80ZA We also need to understand that if we (sic) "lose wheat crop" then bread prices go up for every
Estimating economic damage from climate change in the United States https://t.co/SBbhc0iPiW
RT @UChi_Economics: #ClimateChange will be especially harmful to #economy of southern US, according to new study by team incl. @amirjina ht…
RT @UChi_Economics: #ClimateChange will be especially harmful to #economy of southern US, according to new study by team incl. @amirjina ht…
RT @USDAClimateHubs: Estimating #economic damage from #climatechange in the #UnitedStates https://t.co/5n3GAtnxSI via @sciencemagazine
RT @USDAClimateHubs: Estimating #economic damage from #climatechange in the #UnitedStates https://t.co/5n3GAtnxSI via @sciencemagazine
Estimating #economic damage from #climatechange in the #UnitedStates https://t.co/5n3GAtnxSI via @sciencemagazine
RT @CECHR_UoD: Estimating economic damage from climate change in the US https://t.co/3ThwLsYrw1 HT @grhluna25 It will cost https://t.co/xC…
RT @dvergano: I asked study authors. They pointed out study was peer reviewed: https://t.co/gf556GeEbx And published in Science https://t.c…
Will climate change lead to new mass migration in the U.S.? https://t.co/rLJZ6MztQd
RT @CECHR_UoD: Estimating economic damage from climate change in the US https://t.co/3ThwLsYrw1 HT @grhluna25 It will cost https://t.co/xC…
RT @metadesigners: Hope all this is going on Mr Trump’s (political support) bill...not that it can be paid back, sadly... https://t.co/L77E…
Hope all this is going on Mr Trump’s (political support) bill...not that it can be paid back, sadly... https://t.co/L77EB2147U
RT @CECHR_UoD: Estimating economic damage from climate change in the US https://t.co/3ThwLsYrw1 HT @grhluna25 It will cost https://t.co/xC…
RT @CECHR_UoD: Estimating economic damage from climate change in the US https://t.co/3ThwLsYrw1 HT @grhluna25 It will cost https://t.co/xC…
RT @CECHR_UoD: Estimating economic damage from climate change in the US https://t.co/3ThwLsYrw1 HT @grhluna25 It will cost https://t.co/xC…
RT @CECHR_UoD: Estimating economic damage from climate change in the US https://t.co/3ThwLsYrw1 HT @grhluna25 It will cost https://t.co/xC…
RT @dvergano: I asked study authors. They pointed out study was peer reviewed: https://t.co/gf556GeEbx And published in Science https://t.c…
RT @dvergano: I asked study authors. They pointed out study was peer reviewed: https://t.co/gf556GeEbx And published in Science https://t.c…
RT @BadAstronomer: WHAT? The House Science Committee attacking actual science with misleading claims? SOP. @LamarSmithTX21 is literally a…
RT @dvergano: I asked study authors. They pointed out study was peer reviewed: https://t.co/gf556GeEbx And published in Science https://t.c…
RT @dvergano: I asked study authors. They pointed out study was peer reviewed: https://t.co/gf556GeEbx And published in Science https://t.c…
RT @dvergano: I asked study authors. They pointed out study was peer reviewed: https://t.co/gf556GeEbx And published in Science https://t.c…
RT @dvergano: I asked study authors. They pointed out study was peer reviewed: https://t.co/gf556GeEbx And published in Science https://t.c…
RT @hausfath: @RogerPielkeJr @HouseScience Except the Rhodium study in question was published in Science. But don't let that get in the way…
RT @dvergano: I asked study authors. They pointed out study was peer reviewed: https://t.co/gf556GeEbx And published in Science https://t.c…
RT @hausfath: @RogerPielkeJr @HouseScience Except the Rhodium study in question was published in Science. But don't let that get in the way…
RT @dvergano: I asked study authors. They pointed out study was peer reviewed: https://t.co/gf556GeEbx And published in Science https://t.c…
RT @dvergano: I asked study authors. They pointed out study was peer reviewed: https://t.co/gf556GeEbx And published in Science https://t.c…
RT @BadAstronomer: WHAT? The House Science Committee attacking actual science with misleading claims? SOP. @LamarSmithTX21 is literally a…
RT @dvergano: I asked study authors. They pointed out study was peer reviewed: https://t.co/gf556GeEbx And published in Science https://t.c…
RT @dvergano: I asked study authors. They pointed out study was peer reviewed: https://t.co/gf556GeEbx And published in Science https://t.c…
RT @dvergano: I asked study authors. They pointed out study was peer reviewed: https://t.co/gf556GeEbx And published in Science https://t.c…
RT @BadAstronomer: WHAT? The House Science Committee attacking actual science with misleading claims? SOP. @LamarSmithTX21 is literally a…
RT @dvergano: I asked study authors. They pointed out study was peer reviewed: https://t.co/gf556GeEbx And published in Science https://t.c…
RT @dvergano: I asked study authors. They pointed out study was peer reviewed: https://t.co/gf556GeEbx And published in Science https://t.c…
RT @dvergano: I asked study authors. They pointed out study was peer reviewed: https://t.co/gf556GeEbx And published in Science https://t.c…
@RogerPielkeJr @HouseScience Except the Rhodium study in question was published in Science. But don't let that get in the way of a good narrative https://t.co/CRIhmZbXQH
RT @dvergano: I asked study authors. They pointed out study was peer reviewed: https://t.co/gf556GeEbx And published in Science https://t.c…
RT @dvergano: I asked study authors. They pointed out study was peer reviewed: https://t.co/gf556GeEbx And published in Science https://t.c…
RT @dvergano: I asked study authors. They pointed out study was peer reviewed: https://t.co/gf556GeEbx And published in Science https://t.c…
RT @dvergano: I asked study authors. They pointed out study was peer reviewed: https://t.co/gf556GeEbx And published in Science https://t.c…
RT @dvergano: I asked study authors. They pointed out study was peer reviewed: https://t.co/gf556GeEbx And published in Science https://t.c…
RT @dvergano: I asked study authors. They pointed out study was peer reviewed: https://t.co/gf556GeEbx And published in Science https://t.c…
RT @dvergano: I asked study authors. They pointed out study was peer reviewed: https://t.co/gf556GeEbx And published in Science https://t.c…
RT @BadAstronomer: WHAT? The House Science Committee attacking actual science with misleading claims? SOP. @LamarSmithTX21 is literally a…
RT @dvergano: I asked study authors. They pointed out study was peer reviewed: https://t.co/gf556GeEbx And published in Science https://t.c…
RT @BadAstronomer: WHAT? The House Science Committee attacking actual science with misleading claims? SOP. @LamarSmithTX21 is literally a…
RT @GlobalEcoGuy: House Committee distorting science ... again https://t.co/ROxlA4hmOO
RT @dvergano: I asked study authors. They pointed out study was peer reviewed: https://t.co/gf556GeEbx And published in Science https://t.c…
This. ⬇ @HouseScience https://t.co/fIbGs3bYBZ
RT @dvergano: I asked study authors. They pointed out study was peer reviewed: https://t.co/gf556GeEbx And published in Science https://t.c…
RT @dvergano: I asked study authors. They pointed out study was peer reviewed: https://t.co/gf556GeEbx And published in Science https://t.c…
RT @BadAstronomer: WHAT? The House Science Committee attacking actual science with misleading claims? SOP. @LamarSmithTX21 is literally a…
RT @BadAstronomer: WHAT? The House Science Committee attacking actual science with misleading claims? SOP. @LamarSmithTX21 is literally a…
RT @dvergano: I asked study authors. They pointed out study was peer reviewed: https://t.co/gf556GeEbx And published in Science https://t.c…
RT @BadAstronomer: WHAT? The House Science Committee attacking actual science with misleading claims? SOP. @LamarSmithTX21 is literally a…
RT @BadAstronomer: WHAT? The House Science Committee attacking actual science with misleading claims? SOP. @LamarSmithTX21 is literally a…
RT @BadAstronomer: WHAT? The House Science Committee attacking actual science with misleading claims? SOP. @LamarSmithTX21 is literally a…
RT @BadAstronomer: WHAT? The House Science Committee attacking actual science with misleading claims? SOP. @LamarSmithTX21 is literally a…
RT @BadAstronomer: WHAT? The House Science Committee attacking actual science with misleading claims? SOP. @LamarSmithTX21 is literally a…
RT @BadAstronomer: WHAT? The House Science Committee attacking actual science with misleading claims? SOP. @LamarSmithTX21 is literally a…
RT @dvergano: I asked study authors. They pointed out study was peer reviewed: https://t.co/gf556GeEbx And published in Science https://t.c…
RT @BadAstronomer: WHAT? The House Science Committee attacking actual science with misleading claims? SOP. @LamarSmithTX21 is literally a…
RT @BadAstronomer: WHAT? The House Science Committee attacking actual science with misleading claims? SOP. @LamarSmithTX21 is literally a…
RT @BadAstronomer: WHAT? The House Science Committee attacking actual science with misleading claims? SOP. @LamarSmithTX21 is literally a…
RT @BadAstronomer: WHAT? The House Science Committee attacking actual science with misleading claims? SOP. @LamarSmithTX21 is literally a…
RT @BadAstronomer: WHAT? The House Science Committee attacking actual science with misleading claims? SOP. @LamarSmithTX21 is literally a…
RT @BadAstronomer: WHAT? The House Science Committee attacking actual science with misleading claims? SOP. @LamarSmithTX21 is literally a…
Too bad they couldn’t get it published in a rigorous journal like the WSJ editorial page https://t.co/V68PKQBQ3h
RT @dvergano: I asked study authors. They pointed out study was peer reviewed: https://t.co/gf556GeEbx And published in Science https://t.c…
RT @BadAstronomer: WHAT? The House Science Committee attacking actual science with misleading claims? SOP. @LamarSmithTX21 is literally a…
RT @dvergano: I asked study authors. They pointed out study was peer reviewed: https://t.co/gf556GeEbx And published in Science https://t.c…
RT @BadAstronomer: WHAT? The House Science Committee attacking actual science with misleading claims? SOP. @LamarSmithTX21 is literally a…