↓ Skip to main content

Plant diversity increases with the strength of negative density dependence at the global scale

Overview of attention for article published in Science, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
110 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
232 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
491 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Plant diversity increases with the strength of negative density dependence at the global scale
Published in
Science, June 2017
DOI 10.1126/science.aam5678
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph A LaManna, Scott A Mangan, Alfonso Alonso, Norman A Bourg, Warren Y Brockelman, Sarayudh Bunyavejchewin, Li-Wan Chang, Jyh-Min Chiang, George B Chuyong, Keith Clay, Richard Condit, Susan Cordell, Stuart J Davies, Tucker J Furniss, Christian P Giardina, I A U Nimal Gunatilleke, C V Savitri Gunatilleke, Fangliang He, Robert W Howe, Stephen P Hubbell, Chang-Fu Hsieh, Faith M Inman-Narahari, David Janík, Daniel J Johnson, David Kenfack, Lisa Korte, Kamil Král, Andrew J Larson, James A Lutz, Sean M McMahon, William J McShea, Hervé R Memiaghe, Anuttara Nathalang, Vojtech Novotny, Perry S Ong, David A Orwig, Rebecca Ostertag, Geoffrey G Parker, Richard P Phillips, Lawren Sack, I-Fang Sun, J Sebastián Tello, Duncan W Thomas, Benjamin L Turner, Dilys M Vela Díaz, Tomáš Vrška, George D Weiblen, Amy Wolf, Sandra Yap, Jonathan A Myers

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 110 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 491 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 486 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 109 22%
Researcher 105 21%
Student > Master 51 10%
Student > Bachelor 41 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 5%
Other 78 16%
Unknown 82 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 216 44%
Environmental Science 115 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 2%
Arts and Humanities 6 1%
Other 19 4%
Unknown 109 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 143. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2023.
All research outputs
#293,631
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Science
#7,945
of 83,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,176
of 328,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#197
of 1,210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,266 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.